Primary Care 2.0 Evaluation
Project Summary
The goal of Primary Care 2.0 was to address the Quadruple Aims through team-based care. The evaluation used mixed methods, including surveys, observation and interviews to assess the degree of implementation of the model as well as outcome measures that align with the Quadruple Aims. One goal of the evaluation was to inform future scalability and transferability of the PC 2.0 model to other settings in order to ensure that the lessons from Stanford inform future primary care practice nationally and internationally.
For any questions or further information related to this evaluation, please contact Cati Brown-Johnson (catibj@stanford.edu).
Funding
This evaluation was funded by Stanford Health Care from June 2016 to Aug 2019.
Featured
Publications
1. Baratta J, Brown-Johnson C, Safaeinili N, Rosas LG, Palaniappan L, Winget M, Mahoney M. Patient and health professional perceptions of telemonitoring for hypertension management: qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6(6):e32874. doi:10.2196/32874
2. Brown-Johnson CG, Safaeinili N, Baratta J, Palaniappan L, Mahoney M, Rosas LG, Winget M. Implementation outcomes of Humanwide: integrated precision health in team-based family practice primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2021;22(1):28. doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01373-4
3. Shaw JG, Winget M, Brown-Johnson C, Seay-Morrison T, Garvert DW, Levine M, Safaeinili N, Mahoney M. Primary Care 2.0: A prospective evaluation of a novel model of advanced team care with expanded medical assistant support. Annals of Family Medicine. 2021;19(5):411-418. doi:10.1370/afm.2714
4. Brown-Johnson C, Shankar M, Taylor NK, Safaeinili N, Shaw JG, Winget M, Mahoney M. “Racial bias…I’m not sure if it has affected my practice”: a qualitative exploration of racial bias in team-based primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2020;35(11):3395-3397. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06219-w
5. Brown‐Johnson C, Safaeinili N, Zionts D, Holdsworth L, Shaw JG, Asch SM, Mahoney M, Winget M. The Stanford lightning report method: a comparison of rapid qualitative synthesis results across four implementation evaluations. Learning Health Systems. 2020;4(2):e10210. doi:10.1002/lrh2.10210
6. Safaeinili N, Brown‐Johnson C, Shaw JG, Mahoney M, Winget M. CFIR simplified: Pragmatic application of and adaptations to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for evaluation of a patient‐centered care transformation within a learning health system. Learning Health Systems. 2019;4(1):e10201. doi:10.1002/lrh2.10201
7. Brown-Johnson CG, Chan GK, Winget M, Shaw JG, Patton K, Hussain R, Olayiwola N, Chang S, Mahoney M. Primary care 2.0: design of a transformational team-based practice model to meet the quadruple aim. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2019;34(4):339-347. doi:10.1177/1062860618802365
8. Brown‐Johnson C, Shaw JG, Safaeinili N, Chan GK, Megan M, Asch S, Winget M. Role definition is key- Rapid qualitative ethnography findings from a team‐based primary care transformation. Learning Health Systems. 2019;3(3):e10188. doi:10.1002/lrh2.10188
